With its draft National
Policy Statement on roads and rail, the Government seems to be lurching back to
a road building approach, already out of date in the 1990’s when it last raised
its head.
We are told that road building
is needed as an engine for growth, that there will be almost a 40% increase in
traffic, and that we must tarmac over the countryside in order to stay
competitive. Forgotten are all the
lessons about how more roads generate more traffic, increase congestion by
moving it from one place to another, damage the economy through reliance on an
insecure resource, not to mention all the ecological, social and climate change
issues.
The
consultation, needing responses by 26th Feb, is carefully framed to
steer people away from the important questions, guiding you towards making
comments on how to limit the damage from decisions that seem to have already
been made. Nowhere is this more
outrageous than in the approach to climate change. The statement simply takes the impact of new
road development on climate change out of the process altogether. Thus one of the most damaging aspects of
transport strategy is specifically removed from consideration. The justification given is that other
Government policies will 'offset' the increase in carbon from new roads. Given that the country has to deliver 80%
reduction in greenhouse emissions (on 1990 levels) by 2050, what area of
economic activity is going to deliver far more than 80% reduction in order to
offset the environmental failure of road travel?
The disconnect in government at present seems
incredible. At a time when extreme
weather events, driven by climate change, are hitting the country more and more
frequently, government still seems immersed in second level issues like road
building rather than addressing the real issues affecting people and their
environment.
The consultation on the National Road and
Rail Networks National Policy Statement ends on 26 Feb (next Wednesday)
and I would encourage people to take a look and express their views. The whole philosophy behind this document is
really bad news for the environment and will allow a massive increase in
roadbuilding while virtually removing our ability to challenge any new
proposals. Please see the Campaign for Better Transport's web site and use
the CBT's
form to send in an objection - it only takes a minute to do. Also, a letter can be sent via the CPRE's
website. Both websites have
pre-drafted words for you to use which you can alter as you see fit if you want
to.
No comments:
Post a Comment